Smith v. Fulmer

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Acting Associate Justice L. D. Dide.

This is a workmen’s compensation case, and the testimony is not printed in the record, but we quote the following from the “statement” in the Transcript, which gives the material facts of the case and states the single question involved in this appeal:

“C. D. Fulmer had a contract with the State Highway Department to build a concrete bridge over a railroad track at 'Roebuck, S. C. He sublet to M. G. Sherard the work of making the fills and laying the concrete paving. The fills were made and the bridge completed…