Legal Opinion

Eutectic Welding Alloys Corporation v. West

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 12, 1968No. 40825PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Eutectic Welding Alloys Corporation and American Eutectic Welding Alloys Sales Co., Inc., (both hereafter referred to as “Eutectic”) 1 employed defendant, Warren A. West, as a “technical representative” in the sale of Eutectic’s products. A written “Employment Agreement” contained various covenants in favor of Eutectic. One permanently prohibited West from using or disclosing Eutectic’s business secrets 2 and another precluded him, for the temporary period of 2 years, from himself competing with or taking employment with a competitor within a radius of 50 miles…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Granger v. CravenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Menter Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Larx Co. Inc. v. NicolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Thermorama, Inc. v. BuckwoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Medtronic, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. S. Todd Gibbons, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. Curtis 1000, Inc. v. YoungbladeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  4. Jostens, Inc. v. National Computer System, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API