Legal Opinion

Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Estate of Keenan

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 31, 2007No. 06-130PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.

¶ 1. In this appeal, we revisit the meaning of the term “double recovery” as used in 21 V.S.A. § 624(e) and interpreted by the Court in Travelers Insurance Co. v. Henry, 2005 VT 68, 178 Vt. 287, 882 A.2d 1133. Specifically, we address the circumstances under which an underinsured/uninsured motorist (UIM) award must be allocated between economic and non-economic damages and, consequently, when a workers’ compensation insurer has the right to reimbursement from the economic damages portion of such an award. As discussed below, we hold that, consistent with Henry, all first-party awards must be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The Travelers Insurance Company v. Susan J. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Charbonneau v. GorczykSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. Travelers Insurance v. HenrySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  4. Coyle v. CoyleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Travelers Insurance Company v. John Henry v. Co-Operative Insurance Companies, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. PROGRESSIVE CAS. INSURANCE COMPANY v. Estate of KeenanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API