Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Estate of Keenan
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.
¶ 1. In this appeal, we revisit the meaning of the term “double recovery” as used in 21 V.S.A. § 624(e) and interpreted by the Court in Travelers Insurance Co. v. Henry, 2005 VT 68, 178 Vt. 287, 882 A.2d 1133. Specifically, we address the circumstances under which an underinsured/uninsured motorist (UIM) award must be allocated between economic and non-economic damages and, consequently, when a workers’ compensation insurer has the right to reimbursement from the economic damages portion of such an award. As discussed below, we hold that, consistent with Henry, all first-party awards must be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The Travelers Insurance Company v. Susan J. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Charbonneau v. GorczykSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Travelers Insurance v. HenrySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Coyle v. CoyleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Travelers Insurance Company v. John Henry v. Co-Operative Insurance Companies, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
3Cited by1 opinion
- PROGRESSIVE CAS. INSURANCE COMPANY v. Estate of KeenanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007