Legal Opinion

Travelers Insurance v. Henry

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 24, 2005No. 04-174PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reiber, C J.

¶ 1. In this appeal, we are asked by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to answer the following certified question: under 21 V.S.A § 624(e), does a workers’ compensation carrier have a right to reimbursement from, or a future credit against, underinsured/uninsured (UIM) benefits recovered by an injured employee under an automobile liability policy that was purchased by his employer? As discussed below, we conclude that under the plain language of 21 V.S.A. § 624(e) a workers’ compensation carrier does not have a right to be reimbursed out of such proceeds,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Cavanaugh v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  3. Reese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Colwell v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  5. State v. MadisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wright Ex Rel. Hood v. BradleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. PROGRESSIVE CAS. INSURANCE COMPANY v. Estate of KeenanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. Feeley v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  4. YUSTIN v. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. GEICO Insurance v. BernheimSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API