Legal Opinion
Coyle v. Coyle
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided March 14, 2007No. 06-059PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
925 A.2d 996 (2007)
2007 VT 21
Margaret COYLE
v.
Mark COYLE.
No. 06-059.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
March 14, 2007.
Present: REIBER, C.J., and DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND and BURGESS, JJ.
ENTRY ORDER
¶ 1. Father appeals the family court's denial of his motion to modify child support based on a lack of real, substantial and unanticipated change of circumstances. He argues that the court erred by failing to recognize that any existing support order that varies more than ten percent from the guideline amount is a per se change of circumstances, thus entitling the parties to consideration of a motion to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Flannery v. FlanneryAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Grimes v. GrimesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- State v. BeriniSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- PROGRESSIVE CAS. INSURANCE COMPANY v. Estate of KeenanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Patnode v. UretteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Patnode v. UretteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Merchant v. MerchantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Merchant v. MerchantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.