Legal Opinion

Asiatic Club v. Biggy

California Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1911No. S.F. No. 5698PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to grant-an injunction pendente lite. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order of the superior court .refusing to grant an injunction pendente lite in an action brought to obtain a judgment perpetually enjoining the defendants, members of the police department of the city and county of San Francisco, from entering upon or in any way interfering with plaintiff’s possession and enjoyment of its premises at No. 118 Waverly Place in said city and county, which premises, it is alleged, are used by the members of said club solely for “educational and social purposes.”

The complaint was filed November 6, 1908, and an order to show…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pon v. WittmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gray v. BybeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Russo v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Strand Amusement Co. v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. London v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Biagini v. ShoemakerWashington Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API