Legal Opinion

Strand Amusement Co. v. City of Owensboro

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 15, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Willis —

Affirming.

The Strand Amusement Company and six of its servants sued the city of Owensboro and its officials charged with the duty of enforcing the laws of the state and the ordinances of the city to enjoin them from attempting to enforce a certain city ordinance, recently adopted. The ordinance assailed was entitled “An ordinance defining commercialized amusements, prohibiting the operation of any such commercialized amusement on Sunday, and providing an annual'license fee for such business and providing a method for the cancellation of such license or…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Cooper v. RollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Delaney v. . FloodNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Ashland v. Heck's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  2. Gastineau v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
  3. Munn v. MunnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956
  4. City of Ashland v. Heck's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  5. City of Ashland v. Heck's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API