Legal Opinion

Estate of Piper v. People

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1905No. L.A. No. 1693PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a decree of the Superior Court of San Diego County, distributing the estate of a deceased person. N. H. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Eva Agnes Piper at the time of her death was a childless widow. In the petition for distribution the administrator of the estate set forth that the estate left by the deceased was the proceeds of community property of the deceased and of her husband, A. Dana Piper, who had died before her. The petition contains no allegation touching the relatives of the deceased wife, but alleges that there was no surviving father, mother, brother, or sister of A. Dana Piper; that A. Dana Piper had one brother, who was dead, and who was the father of the petitioner and of certain other children, who had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martinovich v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People ex rel. Attorney-General v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Estate of PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Houser & Haines Manufacturing Co. v. HargroveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Grossblatt v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. De Rome v. Great Western Smelting & Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. In Re Estate of WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Estate of TorranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Flannigan v. TowleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API