People ex rel. Attorney-General v. Roach
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
On April 4, 1883, Thomas H. Blythe, a citizen of the United States and resident of the city of San Francisco, died intestate, leaving property valued by the appraisers at $2,490,236.54. Defendant was appointed administrator of the estate on June 12,1883, and duly qualified. On June 23,1883, the notice to creditors to present their claims within ten months from said date was first published. Before the expiration of said ten months, viz., on March 21, 1884, the information herein was filed by Attorney-General Marshall in behalf of the state of California, praying for a decree that said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. PalmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- State v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by33 opinions
- Griffin v. County of ColusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Estate of FriedmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- McClellan v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.