Legal Opinion

Harman v. Hurst

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 13, 1931No. [No. 54, October Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

A residuary legatee under a will of his father sues in equity to remove a cloud upon title claimed by him in real estate once conveyed by the father to the respondent, his daughter, with a reservation in the grantor of a power to sell, and later conveyed by the grantor to another and by that other back to the grantor. The relief has been denied and the complainant appeals. The questions raised for decision are three: Was the reservation in the deed to the daughter invalid because repugnant to the estate granted? If not invalid for that reason, was it invalid because inserted in the deed in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Craig v. LeslieSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  2. Tatham's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Prentice v. . JanssenNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Rockland-Rockport Lime Co. v. . LearyNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Shepherd v. BevinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1850

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harrison v. PrenticeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Dowell v. DowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  3. Dukes v. CrumptonMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hutchinson v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Alderman v. CrenshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API