Prentice v. . Janssen
New York Court of Appeals
• Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the second judicial department, affirming a judgment, entered on the report of a referee. (Reported below, 14 Hun,-548.) The nature of the action and the facts arc set forth sufficiently in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The complaint in this action demands an equitable partition or sale of several pieces of land therein described, upon a portion of which was erected a hotel, called the Pavilion Hotel, together with the personal property, consisting of furniture in said hotel, and that an account be taken of the disbursements and expenditures made by the plaintiff, Augustus Prentice, for the benefit of and as additions to said property, and that the share of the defendant, Mary Ami Janssen, be charged upon the same and deducted from her portion of the proceeds of the sale of the property. The land belonged to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bevan v. . CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Hetzel v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Crittenden v. . FairchildNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Garvey v. . McDevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Taylor v. BaldwinNew York Supreme Court · 1850
3Cited by46 opinions
- Trask v. . SturgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Bank of Ukiah v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Givens v. OttSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Thorn v. de BreteuilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Williams v. LobbanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.