Legal Opinion

Alderman v. Crenshaw

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1951No. 33665PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

A condition in a deed prohibiting a tenant in fee simple . from alienating the land conveyed thereby is repugnant to the estate limited and is absolutely void. Farkas v. Farkas, 200 Ga. 886 (2) (38 S. E. 2d, 924); Stamey v. McGinnis, 145 Ga. 226 (88 S. E. 935); Crumpler v. Barfield, 114 Ga. 570 (40 S. E. 808); Freeman v. Phillips, 113 Ga. 589 (38 S. E. 943); Tiffany, Law of Real Property, 3rd ed., § 198; 26 C.J.S., Deeds, § 145. Code § 85-903 provides that conditions repugnant to the estate granted are void. An estate in fee simple, such as that conveyed by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Neely v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Stamey v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Grant v. HaymesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Hill v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Davis, Et Ux. v. GeyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hortman v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API