Legal Opinion

MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ and CAPULA-CORTES

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2019No. 3951PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

27 I&N Dec. 520

(BIA 2019) Interim Decision #3951 Matter of Silvestre MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ, Respondent Matter of Rufina CAPULA-CORTES, Respondent Decided May 1, 2019 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A deficient notice to appear that does not include the time and place of an alien’s initial removal hearing is perfected by the subsequent service of a notice of hearing specifying that missing information, which satisfies the notice requirements of section 239(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a) (2012),…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. Serah Karingithi v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. CERNABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1991
  5. BERMUDEZ-COTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Jordany Pierre-Paul v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Juan CortezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. Erika Yanez-Pena v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. Isaias Lorenzo Lopez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. Gilberto Garcia-Romo v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API