Legal Opinion
CERNA
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1991No. ID 3161PublishedCited by 116 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3161 MATTER OF CERNA In Deportation Proceedings A-30257519 Decided by Board October 7, 1991 (1)An applicant for relief under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (1988), must be a lawful permanent resident of the United States and must have a lawful unrelinquished domicile of 7 consecutive years. (2)Barring a subsequent reversal of a respondent's deportability finding by an appellate court or administratively, an alien's status as a lawful permanent alien ends upon the entry of an administratively final order of deportation. (3)A…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha WangSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- MARINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- BURBANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1994
- Jin Ming Liu v. Alberto R. Gonzales, 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Nuradin Ahmed v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- J-JBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.