Legal Opinion

BERMUDEZ-COTA

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2018No. ID 3935PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

27 I&N Dec. 441

(BIA 2018) Interim Decision #3935 Matter of German BERMUDEZ-COTA, Respondent Decided August 31, 2018 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A notice to appear that does not specify the time and place of an alien’s initial removal hearing vests an Immigration Judge with jurisdiction over the removal proceedings and meets the requirements of section 239(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a) (2012), so long as a notice of hearing specifying this information is later sent to the alien. Pereira…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chafin v. ChafinSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. Gomez-Palacios v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. CASTRO-TUMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
  5. L-A-B-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Serah Karingithi v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Jordany Pierre-Paul v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  3. Cecilia Aguilar Fermin v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Mario Ortiz-Santiago v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  5. Darvin Daniel Perez-Sanchez v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API