United States v. Juan Cortez
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAMELA HARRIS, Circuit Judge:
Juan Cortez, a citizen of Mexico, was charged with illegally reentering the United States after having been removed years prior. Cortez conceded that he was unlawfully present, but argued that his initial removal order was invalid because of an alleged filing defect that deprived the immigration court of "jurisdiction" over his case. The district court rejected that argument, and Cortez subsequently pleaded guilty while preserving his right to raise the issue on appeal.
We affirm the district court's order. We first hold that the premise of Cortez's argument - that…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Darvin Daniel Perez-Sanchez v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Sonia Perez Vasquez v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Lopez-Munoz v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Martinez-Perez v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Jexte Cedillos-Cedillos v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.