Legal Opinion
Cummins Incorporated (Formerly Known as Cummins Engine Company) v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 17, 2006No. 05-1482PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Cummins Inc. appeals the United States Court of International Trade’s grant of summary judgment, which held that the crankshafts imported by Cummins into the United States did not originate in Mexico and were not entitled to preferential treatment under the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”). Cummins Inc. v. United States, 377 F.Supp.2d 1365 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2005). We affirm.
Background
Under the United States’ tariff laws, products that “originate in the territory of a NAFTA party” are entitled to preferential duty treatment. General Note 12(a)(ii), Harmonized…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sanchez-Llamas v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- CamelBak Products, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Deckers Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Lemans Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Wilton Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.