Legal Opinion

Clarendon Marketing, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 22, 1998No. 97-1284PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

This case presents us with a sticky question of statutory construction, one of first impression, regarding the tariff classification of imports of certain petroleum products. The merchandise falls within the accepted definition of “naphthas,” but is also suitable and commonly used as a motor fuel blending stock. The constructional question is whether the merchandise should be classified under the tariff subheading “Naphthas (except motor fuel or motor fuel blending stock),” or under the subheading “Motor fuel blending stock,” the latter carrying a substantially higher…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Nidec Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. E.M. Chemicals v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
  4. Clarendon Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  2. Primal Lite, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  3. Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  4. Aromant Usa, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  5. Airflow Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API