Haering v. Topa Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHAVEZ, J.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether an excess liability insurance policy that “follows form” to an underlying primary policy that provides uninsured motorist/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage must also provide such coverage after the underlying policy limit has been exhausted. We hold that the excess policy does not provide coverage for first party UM/UIM claims because the policy’s insuring agreement unambiguously limits the insurer’s indemnity obligation to third party liability claims. We therefore affirm the judgment entered in the excess insurer’s favor.
BA…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Komorsky v. Farmers Ins. Exch., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Montrose Chem. Corp. v. Superior Court of State, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Cross v. American International GroupDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Cross v. RLI Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Komorsky v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.