Legal Opinion

Joplin v. Nystel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 31, 1948No. 5879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTS, Chief Justice.

Appellants, Charles A. Joplin and wife Gladys Joplin, sued appellee, J. P. Nystel, for damages in the sum of $3100 for the breach of an alleged parole contract of sale by appellants to appellee of an undivided one-half interest in minerals in and under Labor 14, League 685, State Capitol Lands, Abner Taylor, Original Grantee, in Lamb County, Texas. Appellee directed twelve special exceptions to appellants’ pleadings all of which were sustained by the trial court. Appellants refused to amend their pleadings and judgment was entered dismissing the alleged cause of action…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. FisherTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Smith Et Ux. v. SorelleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Taber v. Pettus Oil & Refining Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1942
  4. Taber v. Pettus Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Douglass v. Texas-Canadian Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burrus v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Cate v. Woods, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  3. Lawson v. HollomanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Anita Sanchez, Indiv. and as Indep. of the Estate of LEOPOLDO GILBERT SANCHEZ v. Hector Barragan, Sr., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2021
  5. Greenville Surgical Associates, P.A. v. Robert Carlson, M.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API