Legal Opinion

Lawson v. Holloman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1951No. 12269PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

This is an action to recover a real estate dealer’s commission. ■ The controlling question is whether or not the listing contract made' the basis of the suit meets the requirements of Article 6573a, § 22, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.

The appellant, J. J. Lawson, listed improved residential property with appellee by means of a written instrument which contained the following clause: “In the event of a sale or exchange of said property resulting from this listing I/we agree to pay the Realtor herein the regular fee prescribed in the current commission schedule of the San Antonio Real…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. DunlopTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Buratti & Montandon v. TennantTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Kerby v. Collin CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Burlington-Rock Island R. v. McCartneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Joplin v. NystelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Huff v. Fidelity Union Life Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety v. Wild, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
  3. W. D. Nelson & Co. v. Taylor Heights Development Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  4. Davis v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Broadway Realty & Trust, Inc. v. GouldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API