Castelli v. Patmon, 90103 (12-11-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} This appeal involves the single issue of whether plaintiff-appellant, Amy Castelli ("Castelli"), is an intended third-party beneficiary under a grant agreement between the defendant-appellee, City of Cleveland's Cable Television Minority Arts and Education Fund ("The Fund") and her former employer, Cleveland Television Network ("CTN"). Because we find that Castelli is not an intended third-party beneficiary under the grant agreement, we find that her claims against The Fund and defendant-appellee, The Cleveland Foundation, fail. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Hill v. Sonitrol of Southwestern Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Norfolk & Western Company v. United States of America, and Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Hester v. DwivediOhio Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hecht v. Equity Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022