Legal Opinion

Castelli v. Patmon, 90103 (12-11-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 2008No. Nos. 90103 and 90104UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} This appeal involves the single issue of whether plaintiff-appellant, Amy Castelli ("Castelli"), is an intended third-party beneficiary under a grant agreement between the defendant-appellee, City of Cleveland's Cable Television Minority Arts and Education Fund ("The Fund") and her former employer, Cleveland Television Network ("CTN"). Because we find that Castelli is not an intended third-party beneficiary under the grant agreement, we find that her claims against The Fund and defendant-appellee, The Cleveland Foundation, fail. For the reasons set forth below,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hill v. Sonitrol of Southwestern Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Norfolk & Western Company v. United States of America, and Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  5. Hester v. DwivediOhio Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hecht v. Equity Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API