Legal Opinion
Hester v. Dwivedi
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 2000No. 99-683PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether Alicia’s wrongful life claims are sufficient to withstand a motion for judgment on the pleadings filed pursuant to Civ.R. 12(C). We hold that they are not.
Pursuant to Civ.R. 12(C), Alicia is entitled to have all the material allegations in her complaint, with all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, construed in her favor as true. Peterson v. Teodosio (1973), 34 Ohio St.2d 161, 165-166, 63 O.O.2d 262, 264, 297 N.E.2d 113, 117, citing 2A Moore’s Federal Practice (1965) 2342, Paragraph 12.15; 5 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Siemieniec v. Lutheran General HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Tomlinson v. Metropolitan Pediatrics, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Willis Ex Rel. Willis v. WuSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Little Hocking Water Ass'n v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- NOCO Co. v. OJ Com., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Newman v. Univ. of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.