State v. Griffin
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentLanzinger, J.
{¶ 54} I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion correctly states that the pivotal question before the court is whether the trial court issued a final, appealable order in Griffin’s case. Majority opinion, ¶ 22. But instead of deciding whether State v. Baker, 119 Ohio St.3d 197, 2008-Ohio-3330, 893 N.E.2d 163, applies, as the Fifth District Court of Appeals held, or whether State v. Ketterer, 126 Ohio St.3d 448, 2010-Ohio-3831, 935 N.E.2d 9, applies, as the state argues, the majority refuses to apply either because the cases had not been decided by 1990. I would hold that there was no…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Pratts v. HurleyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BeyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.