Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Griffin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2013No. 2011-0818Published

1DissentLanzinger, J.

{¶ 54} I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion correctly states that the pivotal question before the court is whether the trial court issued a final, appealable order in Griffin’s case. Majority opinion, ¶ 22. But instead of deciding whether State v. Baker, 119 Ohio St.3d 197, 2008-Ohio-3330, 893 N.E.2d 163, applies, as the Fifth District Court of Appeals held, or whether State v. Ketterer, 126 Ohio St.3d 448, 2010-Ohio-3831, 935 N.E.2d 9, applies, as the state argues, the majority refuses to apply either because the cases had not been decided by 1990. I would hold that there was no…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Pratts v. HurleyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. BeyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API