State v. Ketterer
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} In this case, we are asked to consider a number of issues arising from the resentencing of appellant, Donald Ketterer, who has been convicted of capital and *449noncapital offenses. We hold that the order appealed from is a final, appealable order, that the Foster remedy was properly applied and no Brady violation occurred during resentencing, and that the trial court properly denied the motion to withdraw Ketterer’s guilty pleas. Because mandatory postrelease control was not properly imposed, however, we remand the case for the trial court to conduct a hearing under R.C. 2929.191.
I. Case…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by314 opinions
- State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Thompson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Grimes (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Myers (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
309 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.