Legal Opinion
Scheck v. Burger King Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided July 6, 1992No. 89-1281-CivPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOEYELER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion to Reconsider Order Denying Summary Judgment. 1 For the reasons enunciated below, this Court is compelled to conclude that the instant motion is without merit, and as such, must be DENIED. 2
In its reconsideration motion, Defendant Burger King Corporation asks this Court to reverse its earlier decision denying Burger King’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Count II of the Complaint (breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing). 3 In denying Burger King’s Motion for Summary Judgment, this Court observed…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Cox v. CSX Intermodal, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Barnes v. Burger King Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
- Bike Fashion Corp. v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Hospital Corp. v. FLORIDA MED. CENTERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.