Legal Opinion
Bike Fashion Corp. v. Kramer
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 16, 2002No. 1 CA-CV 01-0300PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
¶ 1 Bike Fashion Corp., Southam Properties and Prospect Holdings (“Bike”) appeal an adverse judgment and denial of their motion for new trial. Robert F. and Ann Kramer (“Kramer”) and Mount Royal Management appeal the denial of their request for attorneys’ fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
*422 FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 In 1987, Capital Development, a corporation controlled by William Dinneen, purchased property at Bell Road and 21st Street in Phoenix (“the Property”). Bike Fashion Corp. v. Kramer, 1…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Gerdlund v. Electronic Dispensers InternationalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Third Story Music, Inc. v. WaitsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Kuehn v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Day v. LSI Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2016
- Romero v. Southwest AmbulanceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Snyder v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.