Legal Opinion
Cardenas v. NBTY, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 4, 2012No. CIV. S-11-1615 LKK/CKDPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
This class action alleges that Defendants NBTY Inc. (“NBTY”) and Rexall Sundown Inc. (“Rexall”) deceptively market and sell the Osteo Bi-Flex line of joint health dietary supplements without support for the efficacy representations made about those products. Plaintiff Liliana Cardenas, on behalf of herself and other similarly situated consumers of the Osteo Bi-Flex products, alleges violations of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act and its Unfair Competition Law, and also allege breach of express warranty.
Presently before the court is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Goldemberg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Quinn v. Walgreen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In re Adobe Systems, Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Miller v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.