Legal Opinion
Stanley-Laman Group, Ltd. v. Hyldahl
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 14, 2007PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
JOHNSON, J.:
¶ 1 The Stanley-Laman Group, Ltd. (SLG), Stanley-Laman Group Securities, LLC (SLGS), William G. Stanley (Stanley), James J. Laman (Laman) and David Eaton (Eaton) (collectively the Appellants) appeal from the trial court order overruling their preliminary objection, which attempted to compel arbitration on three counts raised by Christian R. Hyldahl (Hyldahl) in his counterclaims. The trial court found that allowing arbitration as to these counts could lead to two different results because the underlying facts would be litigated in arbitration and also in the trial court.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Smay v. E.R. Stuebner, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- In Re The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practice Litigation All Agent ActionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Samuel J. Marranca General Contracting Co. v. Amerimar Cherry Hill Associates Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Keystone Technology Group, Inc. v. Kerr Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Goral v. Fox Ridge, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Zimmer v. CooperNeff Advisors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- R.M. v. J.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- O'DONNELL v. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- GGIS Insurance Services, Inc. v. Lincoln General InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Hyldahl v. DenlingerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.