Legal Opinion
Goral v. Fox Ridge, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 30, 1996No. 01121 PHL 1996PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAYLOR, Judge:
This interlocutory appeal as of right is taken by Appellants, Fox Ridge, Inc. and Edward Walsh, from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County denying their motion to compel arbitration. We affirm.
Fox Ridge is a corporation engaged in the construction and development of residential properties, and Walsh is an officer of the corporation. In 1985 Victoria Person-Goral (“AppelleeWife”) purchased from Fox Ridge a lot and a new home that Fox Ridge had constructed on the lot. Although only Appellee-Wife signed the agreement of sale as buyer, the agreement acknowledged…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ambridge Borough Water Authority v. ColumbiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Samuel J. Marranca General Contracting Co. v. Amerimar Cherry Hill Associates Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Waddell v. ShriberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Merchants Mutual Insurance v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Midomo Co. v. Presbyterian Housing Development Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- LSI Title Agency, Inc. v. Evaluation Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Highmark Inc. v. Hospital Service Ass'n of Northeastern PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Keystone Technology Group, Inc. v. Kerr Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.