Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Durand

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1935No. Crim. 1843PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Petitioner is imprisoned in the state prison at San Quentin and seeks to be released therefrom on habeas corpus.

He was sentenced thereto by the Superior Court of Los Angeles County pursuant to a judgment of conviction which recites that he pleaded guilty to “the crime of escape from the legal custody of an officer, to-wit: Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles ... in violation of section 107 Penal Code of California, a felony, as charged in the information”. Said section 107 reads as follows: “Every prisoner charged with or convicted of a felony who is confined in any jail or prison or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. In Re HainesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. In Re HalcombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Twin Falls Canal Co. v. HuffIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. People v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. KeillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API