Legal Opinion

Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1938No. 6510PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Bespondent applied to the commissioner of reclamation of the state to appropriate 200 cubic feet per second of the public waters from Bock Creek, in Twin Falls county for power-pumping purposes. Notice of the application was duly published, and appellant filed a protest thereto and a hearing was had before the commissioner, who overruled the protest and approved the permit whereupon appellant appealed to the district court, whereupon respondent moved to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that chapter 145, Sess. Laws 1935, page 353, amending sections 41-2'02, 41-203 and 41-204, I. C. A., is…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Smiley v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Tarpey v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State v. SmileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Dean v. CrispCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Swensen v. Buildings, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Greer v. Lewiston Golf & Country Club, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. HightowerIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. Van SickleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API