Legal Opinion

In Re Haines

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 1924No. Crim. No. 810PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The petitioner claims that he is being unlawfully restrained of his personal liberty by the sheriff of Shasta County, and has petitioned this court for his enlargement through the writ of habeas corpus. The ground upon which he seeks release from his alleged unlawful imprison ment is that there is no such crime known to our law as that for which he is so being held.

It appears from the petition that the prisoner, at the time of the commission of the crime for which the sheriff is now holding him, was serving a sentence in the county jail of Shasta County for the crime of malicious mischief, a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. Sacramento Butchers' Protective Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. WhippleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. In Re HalcombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. In re CulverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. Nagle v. the Leader Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State v. DobrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API