Legal Opinion

Withington v. Gypsy Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 23, 1918No. 8680PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Suit by G. M„ W'ithington, against the Gypsy Oil Company. From an order sustaining a demurrer to the petition, plaintiff brings ^error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

This is an appeal from the order of the district court of Tulsa county, Oltla., sustaining a demurrer to the petition of the plaintiff in error, G. M. Withington, filed by him in the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., in an action to recover from the defendant in error, Gypsy Oil Company, a one-fourth interest in all the gasoline produced from casinghead gas taken by it from (lie 120 acres of land described in the petition, less the cost of converting said casing-head gas into gasoline. The parties will hereinafter be designated as they appeared in the trial court.

The material facts, as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. CoppadgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Kansas City Bridge Co. v. Lindsay Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Lamont Gas & Oil Co. v. Doop & FraterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Burnham-Hanna-Munger Dry Goods Co. v. HillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Dodson v. St. Paul Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Hammett Oil Co. v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Anthis v. Sullivan Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Ludey v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API