Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1903No. 13,219PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Miami district court; W. H. Sheldon, judge.

1Per curiam

This was an action by the defendant in error on a petition setting out facts which would warrant the entering of a decree for a divorce and alimony, or for alimony alone, against the plaintiff in error, then her husband. A decree for both divorce and alimony was entered. The most meritorious question raised on the petition is whether, under a petition whose allegations would authorize a divorce but the prayer of which is only that alimony be allowed, a decree of divorce should be granted; - It is well settled in this state that the prayer of the petition forms no part of it, and that relief…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. KimballSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fraley, Adm'r v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Templer v. Muncie Lodge, I. O. O. F.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Withington v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Eagan v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Rochester v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API