Legal Opinion

United States v. Private Brands, Inc., and Francis P. Carey

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 3, 1958No. 24053_1PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The appellants were convicted on each count of a twenty-one count indictment charging violations of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1001. 1 In substance the charge was that they falsely and fraudulently represented to an agency of the United States that bottles of chloroform purchased by the government from Private Brands, Inc., of which Carey was President and controlling stockholder, conformed to the standards of the United! States Pharmacopoeia, referred to as “USP,” when in fact they did not, as defendants well knew. In sixteen of the counts the false representation was made by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Raphael PlattnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  3. United States ex rel. Maldonado v. DennoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  4. United States v. Trunnell Levett Price, and Arnold Lewis CoffeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. State v. GethersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API