Legal Opinion

De Marcos v. Overholser

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 9, 1943No. 8441PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Associate Justice.

Appellant, who is confined in St. Elizabeths Hospital on the ground that he is of unsound mind and that his release would be dangerous, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court dismissed the petition and discharged the writ. The sole ground of error presented by counsel, appointed to represent the indigent petitioner in this court, is that the court failed to submit the issue of appellant’s sanity to the Commission on Mental Health in the District of Columbia.

Petitioner repudiated the argument of his counsel and presented independent briefs and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barry v. HallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Ex Parte RosierCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Barry v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  4. Howard v. OverholserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. De Marcos v. OverholserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Charles C. Rouse v. Dale C. Cameron, Superintendent, Saint Elizabeths HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Catherine Lake v. Dale C. Cameron, Superintendent, Saint Elizabeths HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  4. Overholser v. De MarcosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  5. Aaron Proctor v. David W. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API