Legal Opinion

Shook v. Scott

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1960No. 34888PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

— In this action for rescission of a contract for the purchase of certain land, the plaintiff alleged that he was induced to enter the contract by the representations of the defendant H. P. Scott (hereafter referred to as Scott) that a well supplying water for the property was capable of producing seven hundred fifty gallons per minute and that one tenth of such production, or seventy-five gallons per minute, would be available to the plaintiff for use on the property covered by the contract and that, in any event, water in such quantities as to render the same suitable for the growing of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Shepherd v. KendrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Harper v. Lott Town & Improvement Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. Holland Furnace Co. v. KorthWashington Supreme Court · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Baertschi v. JordanWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Markov v. ABC Transfer & Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Fruit Industries Research Foundation, D/B/A Food Industries Research & Engineering v. The National Cash Register CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. McGowan v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API