Legal Opinion
Diener v. Reed
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 10, 2003No. 03-1405UnpublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellants challenge the denial of an injunction against the City of Harrisburg (“Appellee”) on the basis that the Pennsylvania Disorderly Conduct statute (18 Pa. C.S.A. § 5503) is unconstitutional as applied, and that §§ 10-301.20 and .29 of the City of Harrisburg’s Parks Ordinance are unconstitutional, both on their face and as applied. For the reasons set out below, we will affirm the decision reached by the District Court.
II. FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Title X of the City of Harrisburg’s Codified Ordinances governs the use of the City’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Forsyth County v. Nationalist MovementSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Samantha Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville and Bush-Quayle '92 Committee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Thomas v. Chicago Park DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- A&h Sportswear, Inc Mainstream Swimsuits, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pappas v. City of LebanonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Patterson v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Com. v. McConnell, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Nationalist Movement v. City of YorkDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- MARCAVAGE v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.