Legal Opinion
Nationalist Movement v. City of York
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 24, 2006No. Civ.A.1:CV-02-1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
Before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment. (Doc. Nos. 38 and 50.) Having been fully briefed and heard on oral argument, the motions are ripe for disposition.
I. Background 1
York Ordinance No. 10 (“York Ordinance”), adopted on April 16, 2002, amend ed Article 741, § 741.03 “Public meetings” of the Codified Ordinance of the City of York, Pennsylvania, to establish a permit requirement for the use of public land and facilities in the City of York. (Attached hereto as Appendix A.) The York Ordinance prohibits persons from conducting any public…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- The Nationalist Movement v. City of YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Kuhns v. City of AllentownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Coe v. Town of Blooming GroveDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Santa Monica Food Not Bombs v. City of Santa MonicaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 99OAG050, Maryland Attorney General Reports2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.