Dusold v. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dubuque District Court. — Hon. J. W. Kintzinger, Judge. Action to recover damages resulting from, a collision between plaintiff’s automobile and a, train owned and operated by defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.
This action is brought to recover damages for injury to plaintiff’s automobile, resulting from a collision between it and cars belonging to and operated by the defendant, at the intersection of Chestnut street, in the town of Dyersville. The negligence charged by the plaintiff is: First, in permitting freight ears to remain on the street with an opening of about fifteen or twenty feet between the same, thereby obstructing the view of persons using the street, and preventing them from seeing ears switched or pushed along the track over said street; second, in negligently failing to have a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bruggeman v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Hartman v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Case v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Lockridge v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Willfong v. Omaha & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Coonley v. LowdenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Davitt v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Butterfield v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- High v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Crowley v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.