Legal Opinion

High v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 17, 1922PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

The appellant operates an electrically equipped interurban railway between the cities of Cedar Rapids and Waterloo. Cold Stream Avenue is a street in the outskirts of the city of Cedar Rapids. It extends east and west, and intersects the tracks of the appellant company practically at right angles. As one approaches this crossing, passing eastward on Cold Stream Avenue, it is necessary to pass through a cut that is about 1,000 feet in length, leaving a bank on the south side of Cold Stream Avenue approximately 20 feet in height. The point where it is first possible to see past the bank to the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bruggeman v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Nichols v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Gray v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Moore v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Platter v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Langham v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Fort Worth & D. Ry. Co. v. BarlowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Darden v. Chicago & Northwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Hitchcock v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. Nederhiser v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API