Legal Opinion

Davitt v. Chicago Great Western Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 19, 1914PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Warren District Court. — Hon. W. H. Fahey, Judge. Action for damages resulting from negligence in operating train. From a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, tbe defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWithrow, J.

I. Action by Mary Davitt, as guardian of Phillip Davitt, for damages resulting from the striking of a team of horses and buggy by a train of the defendant. There was a trial to a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals. Appellant presents no error as against the finding of negligence on its part, but insists that the record affirmatively shows contributory negligence on the part of the driver of the team; and this is the only question presented by the appeal. The evidence material to that inquiry is in substance as follows: The crossing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Case v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Willfong v. Omaha & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Schulte v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Dusold v. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Harper v. BarnardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Coonley v. LowdenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. Glanville v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Butterfield v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. High v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Nederhiser v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API