Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Dawson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1931No. 1 Div. 664PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

The question is, Can the wife maintain an action in tort committed in Mississippi against her husband in the courts of Alabama for which she could not recover under the laws of Mississippi notwithstanding she could do so in Alabama, the parties being citizens of Alabama, when the injury occurred or the tort was committed in the state of Mississippi?

It is well settled by the decisions of this court that, where an accident occurs in another state, the courts of this state will look to the substantive law of that state to determine whether the defendant under that law has breached any legal duty…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. Austin v. AustinMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Cubbedge, Hazlehurst & Co. v. NapierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Fitts v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. McNeal v. Administrator of Estate of McNealMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Shaw v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Bennett v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Automotive Acceptance Corporation v. PowellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API