Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Humble

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 8, 1901No. 177PublishedCited by 39 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIROUXT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH OIRCUIT. This was an action brought by Emma Humble against the Texas and Pacific Railway Company in the circuit, court of Miller County, Arkansas, to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by her in the defendant’s station at Texarkana, Arkansas, on April 9, 1898, by reason of defendant’s negligence, and removed on defendant’s petition to the United States Circuit Court for the Western District of Arkansas.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIROUXT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH OIRCUIT. This was an action brought by Emma Humble against the Texas and Pacific Railway Company in the circuit, court of Miller County, Arkansas, to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by her in the defendant’s station at Texarkana, Arkansas, on April 9, 1898, by reason of defendant’s negligence, and removed on defendant’s petition to the United States Circuit Court for the Western District of Arkansas. Plaintiff obtained judgment, which was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 97 Ped. Hep. 837,…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fullee

Plaintiff in error contends that the judgment should be reversed because the Circuit Court erred in declining to direct the joinder of the husband; in applying the law of Arkansas in the trial of the case and not that of Louisiana; and in allowing impaired earning power to be considered as an element of recovery.

The statutes of Arkansas provided- that a married women “ might maintain an action in her own name for or on account of her sole or separate estate or property,.or for damages against any person or body corporate for any injury to her person, character or property.” S. & II. Dig. §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. H.M. Filer v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Wright v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Blaechinska v. Howard Mission & Home for Little WanderersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Harmon v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Jagers v. Royal Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. William H. Rankin Co. v. Associated Bill Posters of United States & CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. StrawnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. New York Evening Post Co. v. ChalonerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  5. Dawson v. DawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API