Legal Opinion

Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 1, 1892PublishedCited by 59 opinions

Appeal from City Court of Birmingham. Tried before Hon. H. A. Sharpe. That the action is not for breach of contract, nor for breach of duty growing out of contract. — R. R. Go. v. Doyle, 60 Miss. 977; A. T. & R. R. v. Moore, 11 Am. & Eng. R. R. cases 243 ; LeForest v. Tolman, 19 Am. Rep. 400; McMaster v. R. It.

Read the full summary

Appeal from City Court of Birmingham. Tried before Hon. H. A. Sharpe. That the action is not for breach of contract, nor for breach of duty growing out of contract. — R. R. Go. v. Doyle, 60 Miss. 977; A. T. & R. R. v. Moore, 11 Am. & Eng. R. R. cases 243 ; LeForest v. Tolman, 19 Am. Rep. 400; McMaster v. R. It. Go., 65 Miss. 264; Davis v. N. Y. R. R. 143 Mass. 301; 33 Kan. 83; 98 N. Y. 377 ; 61 Iowa 441; 61 Tex. 432 ; 72 Ind. 220; 10 Ohio St. 121; E. T. V. & G. Rwy. v. Lewis, 14 S. W. Rep. 603 ; 23 N. Y. 465 ; 5 Am. & Eng. Éncyc. 127; 3 lb. 522; 10 S. Rep. 661; 2 Thornp. on Neg. p. 1282. as…

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.

— The plaintiff "W. D. Carroll is, and was at the time of entering into the service of the defendant, the Alabama Great Southern Bailroad Company, and at the time of being injured in that service, a citizen of Alabama. The defendant is an Alabama corporation operating a railroad extending from Chattanooga in the State of Tennessee through Alabama to Meridian in the State Mississippi. At the time of the casualty complained of, plaintiff was in the service of the defendant in the capacity of brakeman on freight trains running from Birmingham, Alabama, to Meridian, Mississippi, under a contract…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. The " Scotland"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Whitford v. . the Panama Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Allen's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Mobile & Ohio R. R. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
  5. Brock v. MilliganOhio Supreme Court · 1840

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Romero v. Drummond Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Mary Ann Waynick v. Chicago's Last Department Store, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  4. Fitts v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. North Alaska Salmon Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API