Legal Opinion
Porter v. Shearson Lehman Bros. Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 3, 1992No. Civ. A. H-90-3251PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WERLEIN, District Judge.
Pending is a Motion to Dismiss and, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment (Document No. 4) filed by Defendants Energy Assets International Corporation (“EAIC”), Energy Assets Capital Corporation (“EACC”), and Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. (“Shear-son”). The motion was filed December 14, 1990. Plaintiffs Zigmund C. Porter, et al., filed their Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss and Motions for Summary Judgment (Document No. 9) on February 4, 1991. 1
On August 28, 1991; the Honorable John D.…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re PaineWebber Ltd. Partnerships LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Paull v. Capital Resource Management, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- In re Westinghouse Securities LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Millan v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
- Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. McCoyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.