Legal Opinion

Millan v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided September 4, 2002No. 04-00-00608-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Opinion by

KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.

We grant Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.’s motion for rehearing en banc, withdraw our opinion and judgment issued November 30, 2001, and issue this revised opinion and judgment.

Factual & Procedural Background

Maria Millan opened two brokerage accounts at Dean Witter — one for herself and the other as trustee for her son, James — using her other son Miguel as her broker. Her investment practice was to purchase municipal bonds, hold them until they matured, then reinvest the proceeds. Over the next three years, Miguel…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Szczepanik v. First Southern Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Davis v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Baptist Memorial Hospital System v. SampsonTexas Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ross v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Omega Contracting, Inc. v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Zarzana v. Ashley, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  4. Westview Drive Investments, LLC and Jack Yetiv v. Landmark American Insurance Co., and King-Phillips Insurance Agency, Inc. AKA Insurtrust InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Elbar Invs., Inc. v. Okedokun (In re Okedokun)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API