Legal Opinion

Frost v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 1927No. 793PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, District Judge.

In the bill filed by complainant in this court on April 14, 1926, it is alleged that he is, and was at all times hereinafter mentioned, engaged in and duly authorized to engage in the operation of a cotton gin in the city of Durant, Okl., under a license duly and regularly issued by the Corporation Commission of the state of Oklahoma under and by virtue of article 4 of chapter 20, Compiled Statutes of Oklahoma of 1921, and by chapter 109 of the Session Laws of Oklahoma of 1925, and that the defendant Durant Cotton Gin Company is a domestic corporation organized under…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. New York Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1935
  2. (PC) Penton v. HubardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. Bevilacqua v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  4. Daniels v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  5. Martinez v. Napa State HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API