Legal Opinion
Thompson v. New York Life Ins. Co.
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided January 14, 1935No. 4552PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.
By its eross-eomplaint, the New York Life Insurance Company, seeking cancellation of an insurance policy, and, as incidental thereto, other relief both legal and equitable, predicates its cause upon an alleged state of facts, substantially as follows:
The Insurance Company issued to Joseph B. Thompson a policy, effective February 23, 1924. This policy provides that the Now York Life Insurance Company «* * * agrees to pay to Mary M. Thompson, Mother of the Insured, Beneficiary, Ten Thousand Dollars upon receipt of due proof of the death of Joseph B.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Whitfield v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Greber v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. DeemCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Terry v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Malloy v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939
- Pyramid Life Ins. Co. v. SelkirkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.